IT_Support wrote:
...most probably not possible to just update the signatures, as the filenames and organization of the sig files obviously have been changed. That's why the "old" signature files are not being updated by the script and new ones are added. I presume the "vdf" extensions means "virus definition file".
You need to read again. Let me put it this way (this is essentially what I said, in a different presentation, and trying to be more clear) :
Option A:
-do not run the script.
-use Avira "as-is", with the old VFD, without updating nor customizing UBCD.
-this is useful in specific cases (not every case), even when the vfd are not the latest ones.
Option B:
-do not run the script.
-go to Avira's website, search for the VFD-only download, and manually update the VFD files.
-beside the *.vfd files, there might be additional files to be added or updated.
-since the updates are incremental, there will be some files that should be as they where before, some will need to be updated, and some will need to be added.
-search Avira's forum and help documentation to find out the exact procedure how to do this manually.
-the procedure is "similar" to the situation where Avira is used in a computer with no online connection.
Option C:
-do not run the script.
-download the entire current/latest version of Avira Antivir Rescue System (as oppose to the previous option, where you download the VFD-only files).
-add the entire new ISO image to the "custom" section of UBCD.
-since you add the the entire ISO, the self-check function SHOULD be fine.
-in addition to the syslinux menu of the "custom" section of UBCD, you may need to customize other parts of UBCD503 (like updating syslinux to the latest stable version, since UBCD503 uses not-the-latest Syslinux version, and Avira uses even an older one).
Option D:
-do not run the script.
-use the latest Avira Antivir Rescue System in its own CD/UFD, separated from UBCD.
Option E:
-do not run the script
-use an additional tool like for example SARDU, to make 1 CD containing UBCD and Avira Antivir Rescue System together.
Option F:
-wait until other people (mods/devs/others) can check all the several differences between the previous Avira Antivir Rescue System 3.6.xx, which was included in UBCD 5.0.3. so they TRY to solve all the differences in one updated script that could work for the current/latest Avira Antivir Rescue System.
-this option may conclude in a better implementation and lower total size compared to the UBCD+Avira complete ISO's together.
-in addition to waiting, you can try to test and report every difference, besides the folder's structure you already reported, so the people that writes those UBCD scripts may try to solve it for a future UBCD (alpha/beta/final) version.
Quote:
Also, from what I can read on this forum, it's not possible to boot ISO files with UBCD, let alone Linux ISOs. If it is possible after all I'd love to know how to do it.
UBCD uses Syslinux or Grub4Dos. Editing, updating, trying, searching, reading... you could learn how to add (Linux) ISO images, whether expanding their content, or as full ISO image files.
It may be necessary to make it the other way around: adding UBCD to another boot menu.
You
may find examples at the several sections of UBCD website
http://www.ultimatebootcd.com, like "customize", "FAQ's", "Tutorials", the "wiki" and so on, and other external websites/forums, in addition to this UBCD forum.
The examples might not be specific to Avira, but they show the possibilities.
Quote:
Also, if it indeed is possible to boot the Avira ISO with UBCD, there's still a major increase in filesize compared to the "old" files in UBCD. The reason is that the Avira ISO contains lots of additional files in the "system\usr" directory, which add up to about 118 MB.
Yes, but the total is still under 650/700MB of 1 CD, if that is your concern. The goal is to pass the self-test of the latest Avira Antivir Rescue System, so you could try to use the program itself.
Using a VM, test the original UBCD503.iso, and you will see the differences (more boot options, different starting UI...).
As I mentioned in my previous post, I did not tried/tested myself the options I described here (and/or in my previous post), but the options ARE available/possible.
If you can report/test (differences, failure, success), then maybe Icecube (mod), StopSpazzing (mod), Victor (admin) and maybe also additional people, can work on changing the script to adapt it for newer versions of Avira Antivir Rescue System.
Your report points to at least part of the problem in the new Avira Antivir Rescue System (different boot menu, different folder's structure, and maybe different self-test method).