Page 1 of 1
Help: UBCD stops after "Loading Boot Sector.. Booting..
Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2007 11:29 am
by Rassy
Hi guys,
I am having problems getting this nice piece of software to work. I burned the latest iso img using imgburn and the CD actually boots and I can see the menu, BUT
when I choose an application the boot-process stops after "Loading Boot Sector.. Booting..."
Any idea what might be wrong?
Thanks for your support
Rassy
Re: Help: UBCD stops after "Loading Boot Sector.. Booti
Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2007 7:28 pm
by jason.b.c
Rassy wrote:
Any idea what might be wrong?
Yea , You burned the disk TOO fast...
viewtopic.php?t=776
Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 4:45 am
by Rassy
Hi Jason,
I just burned with 1x speed using IMGBurn but still it stops after "Loading..."
Any ideas?
Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 10:23 am
by jason.b.c
Maybe you got a bad download..? , You should delete the old one and download again...
Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 11:46 am
by Rassy
OK, i did a MD5 checksum test on the downloaded ISO-Image and it equals the published number (4330c7ce679f00963373a768837cf3a0).
So its not about a wrong download.
Any other ideas? I really need to test this harddrive of mine
Thanks for your support
Rassy
Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 7:24 pm
by jason.b.c
uh , well i am really out of idea's then , all i can say is burn another one , if that still don't work you may be S O L ....
Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 7:27 pm
by verndog
Rassy wrote:OK, i did a MD5 checksum test on the downloaded ISO-Image and it equals the published number (4330c7ce679f00963373a768837cf3a0).
So its not about a wrong download.
Any other ideas? I really need to test this harddrive of mine
Thanks for your support
Rassy
Try in one of the virtual machines.
Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 6:24 am
by Rassy
@dog: virtual machines? Where do I find those?
Thanks for your support guys!!
Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 12:41 pm
by Constance
Rassy wrote:virtual machines? Where do I find those?
For example
MS Virtual PC 2007 (seems to be the easiest to use), or
VMWare player, with help of that :
http://www.easyvmx.com/ (you can't create a virtual machine with VMWare player ~~ ).
There are others but seemed to me they were either a pain to configure ( I'm thinking about qemu ) or very unstable ( now thinking about virtualbox ...).
Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 4:04 pm
by jason.b.c
Why in the world does he need a virtual machine..?
If the disk he already has dosen't boot...!
Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 9:35 pm
by verndog
jason.b.c wrote:Why in the world does he need a virtual machine..?
If the disk he already has dosen't boot...!
The reason is, he's having trouble with the burn. If he uses the ISO in a virtual machine that would eliminate the burn.
I do not agree with Constance regarding VrtualBox. It has NEVER been unstable with any runs that I have used.
VirtualBox is free and still being maintained. If you have problem with it, then report the bug. How else can a program improve without involvement, as in Ultimate Boot disk bug related fixes.
Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 10:55 pm
by Constance
verndog wrote:I do not agree with Constance regarding VrtualBox. It has NEVER been unstable with any runs that I have used.
Well I have never been able to install Windows 98 in VirtualBox without several crashes during install - and was never able to finish installing it correctly - though I had no problem with doing it in Virtual PC, using the very same ISO image or real disk in drive.
Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2007 4:24 am
by Victor Chew
QEMU Manager is quite a nice frontend to QEMU. I use it sometimes as an alterative VM for testing.
Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2007 4:26 am
by Victor Chew
BTW, Rassy, you could also try the CDR you burnt on a different machine and see if you get the same problem. If could be some incompatibility with the machine itself.
Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2007 8:05 am
by verndog
Constance wrote:Rassy wrote:virtual machines? Where do I find those?
For example
MS Virtual PC 2007 (seems to be the easiest to use), or
VMWare player, with help of that :
http://www.easyvmx.com/ (you can't create a virtual machine with VMWare player ~~ ).
There are others but seemed to me they were either a pain to configure ( I'm thinking about qemu ) or very unstable ( now thinking about virtualbox ...).
Thanks for the info on "easyvmx" ! I never knew it existed. I have both VMware workstation & Player. Player is smaller but can't create virtual machine. I'll try easyvmx.
Rassy would benefit from using a VM to check first any mods he makes before burning to CD. It's sooo much faster, and a great quick check.
PS- I never used any virtualmachine with win98.
Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2007 3:46 pm
by Constance
Victor Chew wrote:QEMU Manager is quite a nice frontend to QEMU. I use it sometimes as an alterative VM for testing.
Nice ^^
I'll give it a try :]
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2007 7:02 am
by verndog
Victor Chew wrote:QEMU Manager is quite a nice frontend to QEMU. I use it sometimes as an alterative VM for testing.
This is a good VM manager! Thanks for info. Very fast indeed. I like the fact you can store on USB pen drive. Small and compact.
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2007 1:30 pm
by Rassy
Hi guys,
I tested the bootcd on a different computer and yes, it works fine there. I am just wondering, whats wrong with my hardware configuration. Is there a list for non-compatible hardware?
Thanks for your support guys
Rassy
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2007 3:41 pm
by verndog
Rassy wrote:Hi guys,
I tested the bootcd on a different computer and yes, it works fine there. I am just wondering, whats wrong with my hardware configuration. Is there a list for non-compatible hardware?
Thanks for your support guys
Rassy
Why don't you list your PC hardware config, HD-sata,ata, CPU, make,model,etc., DVD/CD info also.
Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 1:18 am
by Victor Chew
BTW, did you apply the
V4.0.1 patch? I accidentally included an older version of memdisk in V4.0, so wondering whether updating it will help.
You can also try to post the question on the syslinux
mailing list, but the discussion there tend to be a lot more technical, so be prepared to eg. regression test on older versions of memdisk until one works, so that the author can identify the changes in the new version that broke on your hardware. This is necessary because the author won't have access to your machine, so he needs to rely on indirect methods to debug.